Upon his arrival in Nuevo Laredo, Enrique finds a camp he can stay at with other migrant teenagers like himself. The leader of this camp, called "El Tirindaro", is a smuggler and heroin addict. He's a type of smuggler known as a
patero, because he paddles migrants across the Rio Grande in inner tubes like a duck. Although he is described as irascible when he doesn't have his drugs, he takes a special liking to Enrique. His generosity can be seen in small acts of kindness; helping him through setbacks and showing leniency when things get hard for Enrique. "When one of Enrique's meal cards was stolen, El Tirindaro gives him the unexpired card of a migrant who crossed the river sucessfully," and "he knows Enrique can not swim, so he paddles him back and forth in the water on an innertube to quiet his fears," (151). Although these things may seem small and relatively insignificant, they are small favors performed for Enrique during times of great hardship. When Enrique comes into contact with his mother, he asks her to pay El Tirindaro to smuggle him across the border. He says, "I know he won't strand me," (168). Even though it would be deceptively easy for him to abandon or rob the migrant boys, Enrique knows that he can trust the smuggler to bring him to the U.S. safely. Even though what he is doing is illegal, El Tirindaro proves to be kind and trustworthy at the core, making him a refuge for the troubled teenagers.
Very often in life, I find myself presented by a situation that seems to be black and white. After all, it would be easier if everything was that way--a clear division between good and evil. However, upon further analysis, very few things we encounter are clearly spelled out that way. While at first glance El Tirindaro is not only a smuggler of illegal immigrants but a drug addict too, it would be easy to put him in the "evil" category. However, Enrique's experience with him would prove otherwise. He looked after the migrants he was indebted to care for and provided for Enrique when he needed help. Several people Enrique encountered along his journey were probably perfectly virtuous and lived their lives according to the law, but neglected to help him or others in need when they were struggling to stay alive. It is situations like this that make it difficult, even impossible, to ever define a situation as black and white. In my opinion, I find several media and news coverage outlets doing just that quite frequently. Magazines use yellow journalism and libel to sell more copies. A certain news channel my mother listens to frequently often picks one side of the story and feverishly reports from that point of view, hardly stopping to consider the issue from the eyes of someone else. Politics are a great example of this--two parties, two points of view. It can be hard to find room for personal interpretation or non-biased reporting in a system structured like that, but as I am constantly reminded, the most important thing is stepping back and not judging something just from what seems true or morally "white". Reading into both sides of an issue and considering something from the opposite standpoint of what you would normally see things from, I find, is the best way to combat biased opinions in a world where things are hardly ever clear cut. Have you even encountered an issue where you originally interpreted things in one way, but for whatever reason, your opinion changed later? What caused you to see things in a different light?